The other three things that are not conjecture are the large disparity in results that I have experienced between state-regulated and self-regulated environments for statistically significant sample sizes in both environments, my reporting of this fact in this forum, and the posting of my conjectures on why this is happening in this forum (which, to my surprise, appears to be considered trolling by at least two forum members). What's not conjecture is that the RTP for UX tournament software can be altered (in favor of the player for tournament play - if desired). Thus we have exhausted the possibility space. There is a reason why there are so many luxurious land-based casino hotel and resorts all across the nation. Video poker machines are designed to make the casino money, not to give it away. But let’s be real here, the odds are not in your favor. a different possibility than the one you put forth. It is no big secret that casino gamblers lose far more money than they win. So, you want to learn how to beat video poker machines, do you Well, aren’t you just a sly little devil, thinking you can outsmart the casino and walk away with a pocketful of cash. However, my conjecture is that it allows parameters that result in an RTP below that of the expected RTP for that UX paytable - i.e. Is it not possible, though, that the software would permit tinkering with randomness so as to increase EV, but will not accept anything that would reduce the EV? The point being that you wouldn't have to do any reprogramming under that condition - you would just have to supply different parameters to an existing piece of software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |